Bye-bye buy-to-let

By mbaxter 18 Nov 2008 [6 Comments | 508 views]


Related articles



And then it hit the buy-to-let market.

There are those who are surprised. For so long we were told that falling house prices would boost the buy-to-let sector. The argument went like this: since more and more would-be first-time buyers couldn’t afford to buy their home, they would have to rent instead.

In September 2007, Nigel Terrington, chief executive of buy-to-let mortgage specialist Paragon, said, “There is broad agreement that buy-to-let is a beneficiary of a softer housing market, as would-be homebuyers defer house purchase and find themselves competing with migrants, students and first jobbers, among others, for a finite supply of rented homes.”

In June 2008, Mr Terrington said: “Commentators forecasting a downturn in the buy-to-let market have overlooked the fundamental dynamic of the UK housing market – people need somewhere to live and, for many, house purchase is simply not an option.”

Then more recently than that, in July of this year, when the last survey from the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) was published, RICS said: “Becoming a landlord is now an increasingly profitable option with rising rents and yields offering good returns.”

It is all a little odd, because the last 24 hours have seen the release of three sets of data, each painting a somewhat different picture. It’s that cliff edge again. It appears the buy-to-let market has found it. No doubt it will drag the wider housing market down with it.

First piece of data to bring such damning news to the sector came from the Empty Homes Agency. It reckons there are now more than 762,000 empty homes in England, with no less than 650,000 of this number owned by landlords. It says there are another 77,000 empty homes in Scotland and 50,000 in both Wales and Northern Ireland.

It’s strange isn’t it? There is supposed to be a shortage of property in the UK.

Then comes news from Standard and Poor’s. It has produced an analysis after studying 200,000 securitised buy-to-let loans. Its finding: at the end of June, 3.7 per cent of this number were in arrears – this compares with an average of 2.9 per cent of owner-occupied homes. Standard and Poor’s reckons between 20 to 40 per cent of the buy-to-let market could fall into negative equity next year.

And the third piece in this damning jigsaw comes in the form of the latest report from RICS, out this morning. Something unprecedented happened to rents in October.

RICS asks its members whether rents went up or down and the balance forms its key headline lettings survey index. Last year, this index peaked at a score just shy of 40. For the next few months it fell slightly, but only modestly, so that in July the index stood at 31.

Well, since then, the index has just collapsed, falling to minus 12 in October. That is the lowest reading ever recorded.

RICS says: “London and the Southeast have been hardest hit with the net balance of surveyors reporting rises or falls in rents for London houses falling from a stable zero per cent in the second quarter to negative -53 per cent in the third quarter, while flats fell from a positive five per cent to a negative -33 per cent. However, the biggest turn around was in the Southeast, with the net balance of surveyors reporting rises or falls in rents for houses plummeting from 53 per cent to -33 per cent. Equally, expectations for future rises in rents turned pessimistic for the first time since July 2002.”

Okay, now it is time to stop reading, and start writing. So, pens out please. There is one question in today’s exam. If rental income is falling, if house prices are falling, if a growing number of buy-to-let mortgages are for more than the property they are lent against, and if there is a massive supply of vacant properties, what will happen next?

If your answer has the word crash in it, then you will probably get top marks.

Bookmark and Share